It would be well for the fame of fortunate destroyers of their species, if they would remember and be admonished by the remark of Ahab to Benhadad, king of Syria: “Let not him that girdeth on his harness boast to himself as he that putteth it off.” The sultan Bajazet belonged to the numerous class of military vain boasters, which is not, while we write, even now extinct. We have seen, that A.D. 1402, Constantinople and the Greek empire, were on the verge of destruction at his hand.

The sack of Aleppo and Damascus signalized the loosing of the Timour-Mogul power from its Euphratean boundary. In a peaceful con­ference with a doctor of Mohammedan law, he said: “You see me here a poor, lame, decrepit mortal.

The conquest and monarchy of the world was the first object of the ambition of Timour or Tamerlane.

On the dissolution of the Carizmian power by the Moguls, some of the Turkman chiefs engaged in the service of Aladdin, the sultan of Iconium; and among these were the obscure fathers of the Ottoman line. They had formerly pitched their tents near the southern banks of the Oxus. At the head of a Carizmian force, Soliman Shah was drowned in the passage of the Euphrates. His son Orthogrul became a soldier of

When the Mogul-power suppressed the Caliphate, which had been held by the race of Abbas above five hundred years, it spread beyond the Tigris and Euphrates, pillaged Aleppo and Damascus, and threatened to join the Franks in the deliverance of Jerusalem. Egypt would have been lost had it been only defended by natives. But the Mamelucs were now established there; and they were equal in valor and superior in discipline to the Moguls. These were heading in the wrong direction. Their mission was towards Constantinople and the west.

The rise and progress of the Ottomans are founded on a previous knowledge of the great eruption of the Moguls and Tartars; whose rapid conquests may be compared with the primitive convulsions of nature which have agitated and altered the surface of the globe.

The second Euphratean angel power did not immediately follow the first. At the close of the eleventh century, and not more than forty years from the inauguration of Togrul, Constantinople and its empire were on the verge of ruin by the power of the Seljukian kingdom of Roum; and nothing less than a superhuman intervention seemed capa­ble of averting it. To have permitted “the killing of the third of the men” “worshipping the daemonials and idols” at that epoch, would have fal­sified the vision.

Such is a brief sketch of the loosing of the first, or Seljukian, angel- power, that it might be no more “bound by the great river Euphrates.” The commencement of this loosing enterprise was the attempted separation of the Asiatic provinces of the Roman empire by Togrul, and perfected by Alp Arslan, A.D. 1071, by the capture of the emperor Romanus. Hence, the loosing covered a period of several years.

Togrul, the Temporal Chief of the Mohammedan World, dying childless, was succeeded by his nephew Alp Arslan, “the Valiant Lion.” As soon as'he was seated on the throne, he determined to continue the work of extending his dominion westward at the expense of “the third of the men,” whom he very correctly denounced as idolators. “He passed the Euphrates,” says Gibbon, “at the head of the Turkish cavalry,” A.D. 1063, “and entered Caesarea, the metropolis of Cappadocia, to which he had been attracted by the fame and wealth of the temple of St.

The loosing must not be confounded with the preparation of the four angels. If they had been “prepared for the hour and day and month and year,” we might have been led to look for their contemporaneous existence during all that period; which would have made any effort at exposition a hopeless failure.